PEMBUKTIAN ZINĀ BI AL-JABR MENURUT HUKUM SYARAK DAN PERUNDANGAN SEMASA: ULASAN KAJIAN LEPAS
Proof of Zina bi al-Jabr from Islamic Perpective and Contemporary Legislation: A Literature Review
Keywords:
zina bi al-jabr, rape, proof, Islamic perspective, lawAbstract
Islamic criminal law is divided into three categories of crime namely hudud, qisas and ta‘zir. Each of these categories has its own rules and principles either in terms of proof and punishment. The crime of zina bi al-jabr or rape is not clearly mentioned in al-Quran or Sunnah. However, there are some views to clarify it as a hudud crime because of its similarities to zina and hirabah. A true understanding of zina bi al-jabr can restore better application of evidence. There are various of study on the concept of proof in Shariah Court. This article will examine specifically on the application of proof of zina bi al-jabr from Islamic perspective and current legal from various library sources such as, dissertations, theses and journal articles and academic books. The discussion fully based on library research and analyzed via thematic content analysis. This study found the crime of zina bi al-jabr is more accurate to be considered as a ta‘zir. Proof of ta‘zir case is also seen as giving more justice especially to women who became the victims of this crime. In this regard, the provisions of the law in the countries of which hudud has been implemented in have also proven that there are some issues of justice and discrimination on the basis of putting it as a hudud crime.
Downloads
References
Abdul Monir Yaacob (1996). “Kedudukan dan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Islam di Malaysia.” Abdul Monir Yaacob (ed.). Tinjaun Kepada Perundangan Islam. Kuala Lumpur: IKIM, 81-115
Abdul Muin Abdul Rahman (1999). Witnesses in Islamic Law of Evidence. Subang Jaya: Pelanduk Publications.
Abū Isḥāq Al-Shīrazī (2014). al-Muhadhdhab. Dimashq: Dār al-Fikr.
Adnan Hasan (1990). Hujjiyah al-Qarā’in fi al-Syarī‘ah al-Islāmiyyah. ‘Ammān: Dar ‘Ammār.
Aḥmad Fatḥī Bahnasī (1983). al-Siyāsah al-Jinā’iyyah fi al-Shāri‘ah al-Islāmiyyah. Qāhirah: Dār al-Shurūq.
Ahmad Hidayat Buang (2007). “Prosedur Mal di Mahkamah Syariah.” Ahmad Hidayat Buang (ed.). Undang-undang Islam di Malaysia Prinsip dan Amalan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya, 145-171.
Ashraf Md Hashim (2001). “Tahap Pembuktian di dalam Kes-Kes Jenayah: Kajian Perbandingan Antara Undang-Undang Islam dan Sivil,” Jurnal Syariah, vol. 9, no. 2, 13-32.
Azizah Mohd Rapini & Ruzman Md Noor (2016). “Syahadah dalam Undang-Undang Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia: Satu Tinjaun Literatur,” Jurnal Penyelidikan Undang-Undang Syariah, vol. 1, no. 1, 41-74.
Azman Mohd Noor (2009). “Punishment for Rape in Islamic Law,” Malayan Law Journal, vol. 5, 1-9.
Mahmood Saedon A. Othman (1996). “Undang-Undang Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah: Satu Analisis.” Abdul Monir Yaacob (ed.). Tinjaun Kepada Perundangan Islam. Kuala Lumpur: IKIM, 119-143.
Mahmood Saedon A. Othman (1990). Undang-Undang Keterangan Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Majīd Abū Rukhayyah (2014). al-Wajīz fī Aḥkām al-Ḥudūd wa al-Qiṣāṣ wa al-Ta‘zīr. ‘Ammān: Dār al-Nafā’is.
Mohamed Salim Al-’Ewa (1999). Hukuman dalam Undang-Undang Islam: Satu Kajian Perbandingan, terj. Khidmat Terjemahan Nusantara. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Muḥammad Baltajī (2003). al-Jināyāt wa ‘Uqūbatuha fī al-Islām wa Ḥuqūq al-Insān. Qāhirah: Dār al-Salām.
Muḥammad Ismā‘īl al-Bukhārī (2002). Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Dimashq: Dār Ibn Kathīr.
Muḥammad Rabi’ Subāḥī (2018). Jarā’im al-Aḥdāth fī al-Sharī‘ah al-Islāmiyyah al-Mushkilah wa al-‘Ilāj. Dimasqh: Dār al-Nādir.
Nik Rahim Nik Wajis (1998). “Jenayah Rogol di dalam Undang-undang Islam,” Jurnal Syariah, vol. 6, 73-80.
Nik Rahim Nik Wajis (1996). “The Crime of Hirabah in Islamic Law.” Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland.
Nor Aida Ab. Kadir (2017). “Compensation as a Remedy for Rape Victims: International, Islamic and Malaysian Legal Perspectives,” World Applid Sciences Journal, vol. 35, no. 9, 1685-1695.
Paizah Ismail (2008). “Kaedah Pembuktian dalam Kes Hudud,” Jurnal Fiqh, vol. 5, no. 2, 23-46.
Paizah Ismail (1991). Undang-Undang Jenayah Islam. Selangor: Tradisi Ilmu.
Ramalinggam Rajamanickam (2014). “Peranan Keterangan Pakar di Malaysia,” The Law Review, vol. 1, 59-71.
Rohayati Sapei (2007). “Darjah Pembuktian dalam Kes Jenayah: Satu Kajian Perbandingan Antara Undang-Undang Islam dan Akta Keterangan 1950.” Disertasi Sarjana, Jabatan Syariah dan Undang-undang, Akademi Pengajian Islam, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Rozilawati Mat Yacob (2010). “Pampasan Kepada Mangsa Rogol di Malaysia Menurut Perspektif Syariah.” Disertasi Sarjana, Jabatan Syariah dan Undang-undang, Akademi Pengajian Islam, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Ruzman Md Noor (2007). “Pembuktian di Mahkamah Syariah.” Ahmad Hidayat Buang (ed.). Undang-undang Islam di Malaysia Prinsip dan Amalan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya, 173-200.
Ruzman Md Noor (2008). “Kedudukan Bayyinah, Syahadah dan Qarinah dalam Undang-Undang Keterangan di Malaysia,” Jurnal Syariah, vo. 16, no. 2, 1-23.
Sayyid Sābiq (2012). Fiqh Sunnah. Dimashq: Dār Ibn Kathīr.
Sidi Ahmad Abdullah (1998). Pembuktian dan Keterangan dalam Undang-undang Islam Rujukan Khusus Kepada Qarinah. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Ṣalāḥ ʿAbd al-Fattāḥ al-Khalidī (2016). al-Madkhal al-ʿᾹm Ila Tafsīr Ᾱyat al-Aḥkām. Abdali: Dār al-Nafā’is.
Wahbah al-Zuḥaylī (2013). Mawsū‘ah al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa al-Qaḍāyā al-Mu‘aṣarah. Dimashq: Dār al-Fikr.
Zulfakar Ramlee Saad (2015). “Pembuktian dalam Kes Jenayah di Malaysia: Isu dan Penyelesaian,” Jurnal Kanun, vol. 27, no. 1, 122-142.
